• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

BDS Notes

BDS notes, Question and Answers

  • Public Health Dentistry
  • Periodontics
  • Pharmacology
  • Pathology
  • Orthodontics
    • Anchorage In Orthodontics
    • Mandibular Growth, Functional Matrix
    • Retention and Relapse
  • General Surgery
    • Cysts: Types, Causes, Symptoms
    • Maxillofacial Fractures, Disorders, and Treatments
    • Lymphatic Disorders
    • Neurological and Facial Disorders
  • Temporal And Infratemporal Regions
    • Spinal and Neuroanatomy
  • Dental Materials
    • Dental Amalgam
Home » Linderharth Index

Linderharth Index

March 10, 2025 by Kristensmith Taylor Leave a Comment

Linderharth Index

 Linderharth had given a formula for predetermining the width of the ideal arch, which is based on the mesiodistal width of crowns of maxillary incisors.
  • The liderharth index is a maxillary expansion index. It suggests how much maxillary expansion is needed to eliminate crowding.
  • As per Linderharth, the ratio of combined incisor to transverse arch width from the center of the occlusal surface of teeth in the first premolar area is ideally 0.85, and in the first molar area, it is 0.65.

“Linder Harth Index Predictive Accuracy”

Linderharth Index Method

  • The mesiodistal width of maxillary incisors is measured and added.
  • In the premolar area, the width of the arch is measured from the deepest point in the transverse fissure of the fist premolar in the same arch to the fist premolar in the opposite arch.
  • In the molar area, the width of the arch is measured from the point of intersection of the transverse fissure with the buccal fissure of the first permanent molar on the same side to the first permanent molar on the opposite side.
  • In the premolar region, the expected arch width is SI × 100/85

“Linder Harth Index Limitations”

  • If the value that is measured is less than the calculated value, it suggests the need for expansion.
  • In the polar regions, the expected arch width is SI × 100/65.
  • If the value that is measured is less than the calculated value, it suggests the need for expansion.

Filed Under: Orthodontics

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Retention and Relapse in Orthodontics: Causes, Types, Functions
  • Mandibular Growth, Functional Matrix Theory & Space Maintainers in Orthodontics
  • Hawley’s Appliances
  • Cantilever Springs
  • Adams Clasp Theory And Fabrication
  • Canine Retraction Classification in Orthodontics
  • Space Maintenance in Orthodontics
  • Distal Shoe Space Maintainer
  • Types Of Fixed Space Maintainers
  • Preventive Care In Orthodontics
  • Space Maintainers: Classification, Contraindications, Advantages and Disadvantages
  • Prenatal And Postnatal Growth Of Mandible
  • Functional Matrix Theory With Special Reference To The Mandible
  • Labial Bows
  • Components Of Removable Appliance
  • Cervical Vertebral Maturation Indicator
  • Skeletal Maturity Indicator in Orthodontics
  • Hand Wrist Radiography
  • Factors Affecting Retention And Relapse In Orthodontics
  • Begg’s Retainer in Orthodontics

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in