• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

BDS Notes

BDS notes, Question and Answers

  • Public Health Dentistry
  • Periodontics
  • Pharmacology
  • Pathology
  • Orthodontics
    • Anchorage In Orthodontics
    • Mandibular Growth, Functional Matrix
    • Retention and Relapse
  • General Surgery
    • Cysts: Types, Causes, Symptoms
    • Maxillofacial Fractures, Disorders, and Treatments
    • Lymphatic Disorders
    • Neurological and Facial Disorders
  • Temporal And Infratemporal Regions
    • Spinal and Neuroanatomy
  • Dental Materials
    • Dental Amalgam
Home » Theories Of Craniofacial Growth Explained

Theories Of Craniofacial Growth Explained

February 9, 2026 by Kristensmith Taylor Leave a Comment

Theories Of Craniofacial Growth Explained

Write briefly on theories of growth.
Or
Describe in detail about theories of growth.
Answer.

Theories of Growth

Depending on the Area Where Growth Center Occur

  • Genetic theory (Brodie)
  • Sutural dominance theory (Sicher)
  • Functional matrix theory (Melvin Moss)
  • Cartilaginous theory (James Scott.

Based on other Concepts or Hypothesis Related to Craniofacial Growth

  • Von Limborgh’s compromise theory
  • Cybernetic theory (Petrovic)
  • Hunter and Enlow’s growth equivalent concept.

Genetic Theory

  • The genetic theory was given by Brodie (1941).
  • As per the theory pattrn of facial confiuration is under genetic control.
  • This theory was a complete assumption and had no proofs.

Sutural Dominance Theory

  • This theory was given by Sicher.
  • Theory was adhered to the belief that within each suture resided the genetic information which determines the amount of growth occurring at the site of suture.
  • As per the theory suture was regarded as the growth center which generate tissue separating forces.
  • The theory is disapproved now and researches show that suture act as growth sites and not the growth centers.

Functional Matrix Theory

The functional matrix theory is given by Melvin Moss and is truly based on work done by Van der Klaauw. The theory states that, “There is no direct genetic inflence on the size, shape or position of skeletal tissues, only the initiation of ossifiation. All skeletogenic activity is primarily depends upon the functional matrices”.

Cartilaginous Theory

  • According to the cartilaginous theory intrinsic growth controlling factors are present in the cartilage and in periosteum with sutures which has only secondary adaptive role.
  • As per Scot the cartilaginous parts of skull act as primary center of growth.
  • Scot suggested that primary cartilage present in the nasal septum is main mechanism responsible for growth of nasomaxillary complex. In mandible condylar cartilage is considered as growth center present bilaterally with Unshaped mandible in between.

Van Limborgh’s Compromise Theory

  • As per Van Limborgh process of growth and development occur in conjunction with three theories. He accept functional matrix theory, sutural theory and genetic theory.
  • He proposes fie factors of growth which controls it, i.e.
    • Intrinsic genetic factors: Genetic factors which are inherent to craniofacial skeletal tissues.
    • Local epigenetic factors: These factors are genetically determined inflences which originate from adjacent structures and spaces such as brain, eyes.
    • General epigenetic factors: Genetically determined inflences originate from distant structures, such as sex hormone, growth hormones, etc.
    • Local environmental factors: These are local non-genetic inflences from the external environment.
    • General environmental factors: These are general nongenetic inflences from external environment.

Cybernetic Theory

According to Pavlov everything affcts everything and living organisms never operate in open loop mechanism. In an open loop mechanism, the input leads to a response and there is no feedback or regulation.

Enlow’s Growth Equivalent Concept

  • As per Enlow growth of a given regional part is compared with its specific counterpart, i.e. growth equivalent.
  • A dimensionally balanced growth occur when each regional part and its particular counterpart enlarges to same extent.
  • Imbalance in growth causes protrusion or retrusion of part of face.

Filed Under: Orthodontics

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Branchial Cleft Cyst: Background, Pathophysiology, Etiology
  • Maxillary Nerve: Origin, Course, And Branches
  • The Father Of Anatomy And A Great Anatomist Herophilus
  • Bone Structure – Anatomy
  • The External Carotid Artery: Anatomy, Branches, And Functions
  • Occipitofrontalis Muscle
  • Superficial Temporal Artery
  • Platysma Muscle
  • Cartilage
  • Cauda Equina And Conus Medullaris Syndromes
  • Subcutaneous Injections And Device Management
  • Types Of Circulation: Pulmonary, Systemic, And Portal
  • Structure Of Skeletal Muscle
  • Elastic Cartilage
  • Cellular Organelles And Structure
  • The Golgi Apparatus – The Cell
  • The Cytoplasmic Inclusions Of Certain Plant Cells
  • Dental Abscess
  • Laser Surgery
  • Our Facial Muscles And Their Functions

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in